10 comments

Amanda said... @ March 20, 2009 at 4:30 PM

agreed. i'd be itching the f*ck out of my legs all day. i think the swarovski sheer leggings from threeasfour are more wearable...

Anonymous said... @ March 20, 2009 at 5:24 PM

ive been meaning to try something like that for a while

Michelle Jailine said... @ March 20, 2009 at 5:43 PM

WOW those are probably pretty difficult to get on!

DISCOFUNBATH said... @ March 20, 2009 at 7:14 PM

I'm gonna say no. They look a little tacky to me.... and not tacky in a good way...

Torchy said... @ March 20, 2009 at 8:15 PM

The Mui Mui ones are pretty cute and look like the most wearable

Samantha Smikle said... @ March 21, 2009 at 12:06 AM

@ Amanda: the threeasfour one ARE really cute. ladies, check em out here: http://www.threeasfour.com/fall09005.html

@emma: you should make your own! you're good at DIYs

@mademoisellemichelle: riiight! and to wear with shoes!

@ discofunbath: def tacky!! almost offensive, right!?

@torchy: i'm think a tone on tone one would be the best option. Like a sheer blk with blk sequins and beads. And maybe in a swirl design down the leg, not randomly scattered. I'd def wear that!

Thanks for your input ladies!!
xo,
S.

Conrad said... @ March 21, 2009 at 12:14 AM

the runway exaggerates things u just got to understand that different fabric and print tights are in now such as lace, cotton ect

Samantha Smikle said... @ March 21, 2009 at 12:21 AM

@ conrad: I def. understand that. See my Christian Lacroix post on identifying wearbale trends in haute couture.

But I also think common brands will try to pick this up. So whether it's runway or not, one can grasp what that means and still not like it.

I do appreciate the innovation in hosiery tho! :)
xo,
S.

Samantha Smikle said... @ March 21, 2009 at 12:22 AM

and thanks for following, Conrad! :)
xo,
S.

Ti Dickenson said... @ March 23, 2009 at 6:19 PM

i would not wear these...this is def a case where simple is better